[wplug] [hackpgh-discuss] Re: Cool! I may be violating Canonical's New Intellectual Property Policy.

[Anthony Cascone]

I'm pretty sure that distributing an image within a team is not the same as
re-distributing on the internet. Don't distribute on the internet and you
should be fine. You can, however, share the instructions you generated to
create the VM on the internet so that others that might be interested can
repeat your effort.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:01 PM John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com> wrote:

>  I allegedly violated their trademark because I distributed an Xubuntu VM
> with non-Ubuntu sourced software for APPPRS without Canonical's Permission.
>
>
> On 07/16/2015 08:19 AM, James Keener wrote:
>
> Which part in particular?
>
> On July 16, 2015 6:21:06 AM EDT, John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com>
> <oflameo2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy
>>
>> I am not going to worry about it, according to the following link that
>> is largely unenforceable.
>> http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2015/07/15/ubuntu-ip-policy.html
>>
>> It will make me want to substitute Linux Mint for Ubuntu in the future.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>
>