[wplug] RPM question - How to make it use a newer lib file thanit'sexpecting

[Vanco, Don]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: wplug-bounces+don.vanco=agilysys.com at wplug.org 
>[mailto:wplug-bounces+don.vanco=agilysys.com at wplug.org] On 
>Behalf Of Poyner, Brandon
>Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 1:06 PM
>To: General user list
>Subject: RE: [wplug] RPM question - How to make it use a newer 
>lib file thanit'sexpecting
>
>
>I would probably do what Beth Lynn suggests, but another option is to
>build mysql 5.0 from the Source RPM.  It shouldn't take very long and
>you'll end up with an RPM that matches your system's libraries.  
	Yeah - but won't there still be a SPEC file that's going to
require those security bits be in place?  I suppose it would have to be
a "try and see"...

(FYI - I think it's "rpmbuild --rebuild 'source-package' " (and look for
rpms in /usr/src/RedHat tree) but it's been a while)

Don



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip Reiche [mailto:Phillip.Reiche at pl.netl.doe.gov] 
>Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:42 AM
>To: wplug at wplug.org
>Subject: [wplug] RPM question - How to make it use a newer lib 
>file than
>it'sexpecting
>
>
>Hi,
>I'm attempting to install mysql v5.0 at home. Rpm barfs and spits out a
>warning that it can't find libcrypto.so.0.9.6 and libssl.so.0.9.6. I
>checked /lib and the reason for this is I already have the new and
>improved rev 0.9.7a of both. Digging through the fine manual, paging
>through rpm.org, and asking our friend google so far reveals no way
>around this, other than stripping out the 0.9.7 packages, 
>installing the
>older 0.9.6, installing mysql, and then upgrading to 0.9.7 again. Or I
>could just just use the --nodeps switch but that seems like asking for
>trouble down the road when things aren't linked right.  This seems like
>something RPM should be able to figure out on it's own, but darned if I
>can find the switch to make it do it.
>
>Beth Lynn suggests  ln -s newlibfile olderlibfilenam, and I'll try that
>when I get home tonight. I expect to see checksum errors when 
>I do this,
>but it's worth a shot.
>
>Any other suggestions, in case this doesn't work?
>
>Phil