[wplug-plan] April GUM

[Zach Paine]

I agree that it should be a two parter, but I think with a little 
reminder it wouldn't hurt to stretch it out over 3 weeks.  Then again, 
if no one steps up to talk about GPG right now, it is kind of a moot 
point.

	-Zach

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 05:45 PM, James O'Kane wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Zach Paine wrote:
>
>> We need a topic.  I was thinking that a presentation on GPG/PGP would
>> be interesting.  Anyone want to volunteer?  Meeting attendees could
>> exchange key sigs as well.
>
> I still want to see a talk about this, but it is almost a two parter. 
> To
> do a proper key signing party, people would need to generate keys and 
> send
> the finger prints to a coordinator, and at the next meeting do the
> verification song and dance. I was thinking at one meeting, someone 
> could
> talk about what it is, how it works, and how to generate keys. Then in 
> the
> week between that and the next weekend they email the fingerprints and 
> at
> an installfest we so the signing.
> I think having 3 weeks between the learning about keys and the signing
> party thing might be too long.
> But feel free to disagree.
>
> -james
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wplug-plan mailing list
> wplug-plan at wplug.org
> http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug-plan