[wplug-plan] Organizational considerations

[Zach Paine]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:15:18 Evan DiBiase wrote:
> Indeed. We need a controlled, reasonable, orderly way to vote on items.
> I suggest the following, modeled slightly after
> http://www.kuro5hin.org's submission queue:
> 
> 	* All users can submit items to vote on into the submission queue
> 	* All users have 1 (one) vote which they can use to either vote
> +1,
> 	  0, or -1 on a particular issue for voting
> 	* Once an item reaches a certain amount of votes (50% of voters
> vote
> 	  +1, for example), the item is entered as an "official" WPLUG
> 	  bill/voting item/referendum.
> 	* When a bill gets to this stage, all members have one vote to
> cast.
> 	  The vote may be of many types, including yea or nea, "choose an
> 	  option," or any other valid type.
> 	* When a certain date has passed (one week?) the vote is closed,
> 	  recorded, and sent to wplug-plan for discussion.
> 
> This probably would not be that hard to code, and, if done right, could
> be a neat way of operating this part of WPLUG.
> 

I think this is a really uber-cool idea!  Do you want to code it?  I could
help out a little.  Is the code for kuro5hin.org available.

-- 
Zach Paine
http://www.wplug.org/~zman/zman.key
Key available from pgp.ai.mit.edu ID: 87746D3D 
Fingerprint: B813 EFB8 ECD0 0C34 6F7F  71DD 01E9 17C3 8774 6D3D