[wplug-board] Re: [wplug-members] Draft Minutes for WPLUG Board Meeting, 7/12/2006

[Bill Moran]

In response to "David Ostroske" <eksortso at gmail.com>:
> On 7/20/06, Bill Moran <wmoran at potentialtech.com> wrote:
> > In response to "David Ostroske" <eksortso at gmail.com>:
> > > Here are the draft minutes for the WPLUG Board meeting held on July 12th, 2006.
> >
> > Notes/revisions inline.
> 
> [...]
> > > REPORTS AND BUSINESS
> > > * PHP class
> > > Bill reported that 2 people signed up for his PHP class, beyond the
> > > number already enrolled as part of the commission for the course.
> >
> > Actually, I reported that 2 people _total_ had signed up.  In the end,
> > there were 5, but at the time of the board meeting, I thought there
> > were only going to be 2.
> 
> I'm a little confused here. Let's say that there were N students
> originally slated to take the course, and an additional number signed
> up or attended later on.
> 
> Do you mean that there were 5 people who ultimately signed up for the
> course, beyond the original N students?
> 
> Or do you mean that 5 people, beyond the N, attended the course, but
> only 2 of those 5 had signed up as of the time of your report?
> 
> Or both? Or neither?

Neither.  There is no N.  Forget about N.  It's very simple.

As of last week's board meeting, I had been told that there were a total
of 2 students signed up for the course.  There's no +, no N.  Just 2,
period.

When I taught the course, there were 5 students.  

It's funny how simple concepts are often the most difficult to
communicate.

> It may not be a matter for the minutes, but it is a matter of
> membership benefits. I'm particularly interested in how many people,
> out of those 5, were WPLUG members who took advantage of the
> membership discount. I know of at least 1 member who did. Were there
> others?

There was 1 person from WPLUG (Greg).  Technically, that shouldn't
go in the minutes, as I didn't know that at the time of the board
meeting.

-- 
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.