[wplug] Question about smartmontools

[Arnaud Loos]

Here’s some info from Backblaze that tells you what SMART warnings they look for.
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-smart-stats/

On May 8, 2015 at 7:50:15 AM, Vance Kochenderfer (vance at happylemur.com) wrote:

Mike Sussman <sussmanm at math.pitt.edu> wrote:  
> My short question is, "If an extended SMART self-test reports 'Completed  
> without error,' does that mean the drive is reliable, even if an earlier  
> self-test failed?"  

I can't claim extensive experience, but I have had one drive fail  
on me after showing SMART errors.  

My understanding is that after encountering an error with a  
sector, drives are able to mark it so it won't be used in the  
future. Assuming that the sector can be read after an initial  
error, the data can be copied elsewhere and re-mapped  
automatically to the new location.  

However, I wouldn't be tempted to say that the drive is reliable  
in such a situation. (For that matter, *any* drive is unreliable  
in the long term.) If it were my drive, I would make sure my  
backups are in order and perhaps continue to use it, running extra  
periodic SMART tests. Once another error showed up, I'd  
definitely demote it if not quit using it entirely.  

In my case, the first error was rather quickly followed by quite a  
few more, so it wasn't a close call.  

Vance Kochenderfer | "Get me out of these ropes and into a  
vance at happylemur.com | good belt of Scotch" -Nick Danger  
_______________________________________________  
wplug mailing list  
wplug at wplug.org  
http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug