[wplug] Firefox is too bloated (bookmark insanity)
Tom Rhodes
trhodes at FreeBSD.org
Sun Nov 11 05:27:07 EST 2007
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:39:23 -0500
Zach <netrek at gmail.com> wrote:
> Heh. Thanks for the feedback Tom. Yeah I may try turning on
> optimization before I give up on Firefox for good. BTW how did you
> produce that process table? I tried ps and top and it doesn't look the
> same as yours.
Different OS's. This is FreeBSD:
last pid: 2829; load averages: 0.25, 0.08, 0.03 up 0+10:39:55 05:22:42
52 processes: 1 running, 51 sleeping
CPU states: % user, % nice, % system, % interrupt, % idle
Mem: 187M Active, 401M Inact, 221M Wired, 1656K Cache, 109M Buf, 162M Free
Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
820 trhodes 1 44 0 357M 80288K select 1 5:00 0.39% Xorg
883 trhodes 7 44 0 121M 100M ucond 0 4:16 0.00% firefox-bin
872 trhodes 1 44 0 56780K 29808K select 0 3:02 0.00% pidgin
847 trhodes 1 44 0 25700K 13332K select 1 0:17 0.00% xfce4-panel
This is Linux (gnu top version?):
top - 05:35:16 up 236 days, 11:46, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.24, 0.48
Tasks: 102 total, 1 running, 101 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 2.4%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 81.0%id, 14.6%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.6%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1023904k total, 1013860k used, 10044k free, 21428k buffers
Swap: 7839552k total, 1272760k used, 6566792k free, 139296k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
24775 trhodes 15 0 12568 944 696 R 2 0.1 0:00.04 top
1 root 15 0 10304 80 48 S 0 0.0 3:25.86 init
2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 1:35.05 migration/0
3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:38.50 ksoftirqd/0
4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0
I'm not sure what POSIX says about top (to lazy to look) so I'm
not sure if there is a "correctness" thing here, probably just
different tastes. I think I like mine better. :P Above, I
killed it too fast for the stats to be gathered. :)
The Linux version of top might be able to change that output
depending on available flags. Again, too lazy to look right
now, a bit tired. :)
Good luck with the optimizations,
--
Tom Rhodes
More information about the wplug
mailing list