[wplug] odd looking entries in httpd-access.log

O'Connor, Michael P. mpoconnor at switch.com
Mon Jun 12 09:44:46 EDT 2006


I will say this, back in 2000 I had the same thing happen the long long
repeating character.  I went to one of the IT people in CS at pitt (I
was still a student back then) and he said that if such a thing was
logged, and I was seeing it, it means that there was a hacking attempt
but it failed, since a hacker would remove the entry from the log file,
to cover their tracks.  To that statement I don't know how much truth
there was to it, but just some food for thought. 

 

Michael P. O'Connor

US&S 

Office: 412-688-2491 

Cell: 412-498-0667

mpoconnor at switch.com

________________________________

From: wplug-bounces+mpoconnor=switch.com at wplug.org
[mailto:wplug-bounces+mpoconnor=switch.com at wplug.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel McQuay
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 7:34 PM
To: General user list
Subject: Re: [wplug] odd looking entries in httpd-access.log

 

right on! i run freebsd so i'm not worried either. and after a few
searches i did see a few people mentioning a buffer over run. 

hey thanks a lot guys for your insight.

On 6/10/06, Gentgeen <gentgeen at linuxmail.org> wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 18:19:25 -0400
Bill Moran <wmoran at potentialtech.com> wrote:

> "Daniel McQuay" <simplebob at gmail.com > wrote:
>
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I was just going through some log files and ran across some weird
> > entries in my httpd-access.log.
> >
> > 71.116.248.152 - - [04/Jun/2006:14:50:13 -0400] "SEARCH
> > /\x90\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\x
> > c9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\ 
> > xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9
> > \xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc
> > 9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9\x
> > c9\xc9\xc9\xc9\xc9 
> >
> > for this email i left out several lines of this but has any one ever
> > seen this sort of thing before? I suspect that it's some sort of
> > exploit.
>
> It's an attempt to exploit a buffer overflow.  I'm not sure which one,

> but I'm certain a few searches will turn up some exact details.
>
> --
> Bill Moran
>
> Not as deceiving as a low down dirty... deceiver.
>
>       Jayne Cobb
>

Yes it is a buffer overflow exploit.  Had a similar thing show up on
mine a while back.  Don't remember the exact thing that was repeated,
but basically the same as you have.

Some googling on mine showed me a buffer overflow attach for some 
Windows Server bug.  Since mine is a Debian Stable box, I just ignored
it.

Kevin



--
http://gentgeen.homelinux.org

############################################################# 
Associate yourself with men of good quality if you esteem
your own reputation; for 'tis better to be alone then in bad
company.        - George Washington, Rules of Civility
_______________________________________________ 
wplug mailing list
wplug at wplug.org
http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug




-- 
Daniel McQuay
simplebob at gmail.com
boxster.homelinux.org
H: 814.825.0847
M: 814-341-6233 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.wplug.org/pipermail/wplug/attachments/20060612/bbb0795f/attachment.html


More information about the wplug mailing list