[wplug] Fwd: [lugc-talk] google databases & personal privacy

Nathan Marcus latefreight at gmail.com
Thu Jan 19 16:26:06 EST 2006


"The government contends it needs the Google data to determine how
often pornography shows up in online searches."

Why does it need FULL DATABASE COPIES if they are just taking
statistics?  I believe it should be possible to use Google as a source
used to find the information in a report they may want to throw into
the bill, but what a load of BS for full copies.  Too much corruption
possible.


But, remember the children!!!


On 1/19/06, Bill Lavin <wlavin02 at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Looks like the Bush people are playing with people's rights again.
> Nobody supports children accessing  porn or being the subject of porn
> but that doesn't seem to be the issue here.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Baji Panchumarti <baji.panchumarti at gmail.com>
> > Date: January 19, 2006 1:05:38 PM EST
> > To: talk at clevelandlug.net
> > Subject: [lugc-talk] google databases & personal privacy
> > Reply-To: talk at clevelandlug.net
> >
> > (DISCLAIMER: no connection to linux, request your kind indulgence)
> >
> >
> > Feds after Google data
> > RECORDS SOUGHT IN U.S. QUEST TO REVIVE PORN LAW
> >
> > The Bush administration on Wednesday asked a federal judge to
> > order Google to turn over a broad range of material from its closely
> > guarded databases.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >  <http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/13657303.htm>
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> wplug mailing list
> wplug at wplug.org
> http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug
>



More information about the wplug mailing list