[wplug] 386 vs 586

eli eli.heady at gmail.com
Wed Feb 2 10:58:20 EST 2005


I would guess that, if it's not a patch to be added to the 586, it's 
because the 686 has more powerful built-in processing features that the 
software can take advantage of, thus reducing the size of the code. If 
that's the case, though, I'd be really surprised that the reduction 
would be that large.
Eli

Arnaud Loos wrote:

>Interesting. There is a 686 version of the package available but it's only
>40K in size vs. 2.5 MB for the 386 and 586 versions. This just didn't seem
>right to me. Any ideas? 
>
>  
>



More information about the wplug mailing list