OT: email disclaimers (was Re: [wplug] Seeking 3 Sysadmins (Linux,
Networking & Windows))
Michael A. Smith
michael at smith-li.com
Fri Apr 29 16:41:10 EDT 2005
Well, if they prevent lawsuits from happening, then that's fine, but as
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ says, (paraphrased) you
can't require someone not to read a document *in* that document *at the
end*.
Jonathan Billings wrote:
>On 4/29/05, Kevin Squire <gentgeen at linuxmail.org> wrote:
>
>
>>My school makes us do the same thing, and it drives me nuts. I have
>>asked a hundred times, to as many people, what good is it. They all
>>reply with basically the same thing; "We don't know, but it shows we are
>>trying". Here is what I found at http://www.emaildisclaimers.com that
>>answers the question "WHY?"
>>
>>
>
>It bugs me that these disclamers are huge, and completely unfunny,
>like some of the large .sigs I've seen.
>
>
>
If you read this document, it's not my fault.
More information about the wplug
mailing list