[wplug] vfat partition problem

billings at negate.org billings at negate.org
Thu Apr 17 14:08:12 EDT 2003


On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 14:02, Paul G Cantalupo wrote:
> Thanks everybody for your help. It seems that umask=022 does the trick.
> 
> Can somebody explain why this is necessary on my Slack9 (kernel 2.4.20)
> system and not on my old Slack8 (2.4.18) system?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul

It's not really a limitation of the kernel, but the
install/configuration procedure.  Did you configure the drive mountpoint
at the same time in both installs?  Maybe the way the installer works is
different now?

-- 
Jonathan S Billings <billings at negate.org>
TSFNKP



More information about the wplug mailing list