[wplug] Was: Tried several distro's. Now: Debian HELP
R.E.Coutch
vze57qmg at verizon.net
Sat Apr 12 13:32:28 EDT 2003
I setup the sources.list to point to 2 http servers with the
testing/unstable versions.
Had to comment out the stabe CD's otherwise I got an error about MMap
out of space.
Ran the command:
apt-get install -f && apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
and the machince proceeded to download about 450Mb od files.
It then began upgrading software.
When it was done, I was up to X version 4.2.1.1 (up from 4.0.1) but KDE and Gnome werre GONE!
It again put an unusable XF86Config file in place that I had to rewrite.
I tried to get KDE by entering:
apt-get install -t unstable kde
but received multiple errors about missing dependancies.
I thought apt-get took care of this.
It back to RTFM on apt-get for now. I'll let you know how it turns out.
BTW - What exactly consitutes UNSTABLE vs. STABLE?
I've got a couple Linux installations running leading edge stuff that I haven't had a bit of trouble with.
Would security bugs/flaws be considered a reason to call someting unstable or just a program that crashes?
-Bob
Michael E Uhl wrote:
>>Not all latest and greatest software is considered fashionable and
>>broken, some of us run later versions of software for feature that are
>>not available in current what's considered "debian" stable.
>>
>>
>
>I agree debian stable has some fairly old software, that's why I run
>debian testing. While it may not include the latest and greatest
>versions of a lot of packages, it includes newer versions than stable
>does and still results in a reasonably stable system. If you want the
>latest version of a software package, like gaim for instance, compile it
>yourself. It's all a matter of personal opinion: you can start with a
>system that has the latest (and perhaps unstable) version of almost all
>packages (i.e. Red Hat) or you can start with a system that has older
>(and probably more stable) versions of most packages and add newer
>versions of the particular packages that you need.
>
>that's my two cents...
>-michael
>
>_______________________________________________
>wplug mailing list
>wplug at wplug.org
>http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug
>
>
>
More information about the wplug
mailing list