[wplug] Oracle 8.1.7 on RH7.3? <<Please Excuse For Full Quote>>

chromexa at ovis.net chromexa at ovis.net
Sun Sep 22 19:27:39 EDT 2002



> ** Original Subject: Re: [wplug] Oracle 8.1.7 on RH7.3?
> ** Original Sender: Keir Josephson <kjoseph at stargate.net>
> ** Original Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 17:33:56 -0400 (EDT)

> ** Original Message follows... 

>
> Well, I will admit that the folks at Red Hat have told me that they are
> only pushing Advanced Server for any new certifications with big vendors
> like Oracle. However, the rep was trying to sell me advanced over 7.1. I
> successfully tested 8.1.7 on Red Hat 7.1 with the conditions I mentioned
> in my last post, a minimal install of enterprise edition, and a library
> patch for the oracle executables (after they're installed) that is
> available on the OTN (otn.oracle.com) next to the free linux download of
> 8.1.7.
> 
> -Keir
> 
> On 21 Sep 2002, Mark Dalrymple wrote:
> 
> > > ya, last time i tried oracle on linux 2.4, it shit the bed with devfs.
> > > (it thought i had like -65535 space free or something.) i dont think
> > > they have fixed this bug either.
> > 
> > That particular one sounds like an installer problem they had where
> > they were using an signed 32 bit int to calculate free space.  If you
> > had more than 2 gigs of free space, it wrapped around negative.  That
> > particular one has been fixed.
> > 
> > Oracle is a huge complicated (and old) piece of software that puts
> > extrordinary demands on the OS.  It's pretty finicky about where it
> > wants to run.  If you're wanting to deploy it with the least amount of
> > Pain, it's best to only use the distributions, kernels, JVMs, etc,
> > that have been ceritified (and long and expensive process for the OS
> > vendor).  Also there's generally some patches you have to run before
> > hand to tweak the environment.
> > 
> > I've had great success with SuSE and 8.1.6/7 using SuSE's online
> > instructions.  SuSE is also the reference platform for 9i, and so
> > there should be fewer surprises there than with other distributions.
> > 
> > Maybe once life calms down I can run an Oracle 8i install for folks
> > at an installpest next year if anyone's interested.
> > 
> > Wheeee,
> > ++Mark Dalrymple, markd at badgertronics.com.  http://badgertronics.com
> >   "It is my firm belief that there is no belief so asinine, no course of
> >    action so bizarre, that it can not have a half dozen web sites
> >    strongly devoted to its practice.  If their maintainers ever learned
> >    to check their spelling, we might be in real trouble."
> >       -- Jeff Vogel
> > _______________________________________________
> > wplug mailing list
> > wplug at wplug.org
> > http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wplug mailing list
> wplug at wplug.org
> http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug


>** --------- End Original Message ----------- **

> 

Giggle, gee that was really useful, and no I am not being
sarcastic. I am an independent publisher. I have a pretty
good technical background that use often but not day to
day. Technical things seem to just make sense to me.

Through my travels through independent publisher land, 
except for a few people I know, independent publisher
land either small or large scale seems wedded to either
the Mac or secondly the PC running Microsoft software.
As I comptemplate getting out of the Microsoft World
and going dual boot where Windows is kept around mainly
to deal with those who deal in the Windows world and make
it easy for them.

Mainly what most people I know want to do is get and
send email around, often with large art work attachments
and the like. They would like a world that is virus free and
where people weren't so paranoid that a "jpg" attachment
causes worry. They want it to work simply and easily.

I want to acheive this. The only sticking point I find right
now is that people who deal with art via computer mostly
use PCs running Windows. One is even pretty much a
Windows wizard. The high-end people use MACs which
are "sort of BSD under the hood". 

So far I am drawing blanks on good linux publication software.
Things where one could produce art and stuff that was close
to camera ready copy one could take to a Printer. Although I
have gotten good art desults with GIMP that do look nice. 
IN spite of its being kind of  "modeful" and reminding me of
EMACS (which I was trained on and like) I have able to show
people how to use it and produce neat stuff. 

I am looking around for other stuff, and wondering if Corel has
dropped much of their linux stuff or not. The Corel Graphics suites
which ARE LIKE Oracle in that they big, powerful and use lots
of resources do produce stuff one could take and use for purposes
of publication... So I am wondering has anyone dealt with issues
like these.

Thanks for Your Time...


Have Fun,
Sends Steve

Download the Lycos Browser at http://lycos.neoplanet.com




More information about the wplug mailing list