[wplug] don't waste your time
Rick Harris
ftumph at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 30 22:18:14 EST 2002
It's obnoxious, but because of their monopoly position Microsoft has become
the de-facto standard that you have to interoperate with. There are two
approaches to this, either have available to you an equivalent (or better!)
piece of software that will communicate seamlessly with the Microsoft
software, or if no such software is available, have the ability to seamlessly
run Windows software.
That's one of the reasons that many people have used the Tunney Act to
recommend that the Microsoft settlement include the publication of the Office
document formats.
I've had a lot of success finding decent replacements for the Windows
software I was using, but I'm not there 100%. StarOffice will still massacre
an Excel spreadsheet on occasion, for example. Then again, maybe there is
something better that I'm not aware of. My fallback position is a copy of
Windows and Office 2000 running on VMWare.
I guess my question is, taking the assumption that we are now in a Windows
dominated computing environment, how close can we get to seamless
interoperability? Can a Linux workstation be configured in such a way that
it is both hassle-free for the user and the other users are unaware that the
computer *is* a Linux workstation. If we can come up with that, then we've
really got something to show people that is compelling and doesn't make them
feel like they're taking a big risk.
Then you put together some sort seminars that people can come to and be
educated. That's a whole other topic.
Getting back to the previous topic, this is why I'm interested in the topics
for Saturday. While I already have VMWare, I'm interested in learning more
about the current status of Wine, and in general I'm curious to know what
others have done to interoperate with Windows in other areas. What is the
best way to handle Office documents, for example? What about Exchange? Is
Evolution a viable solution to this? (I say this with almost no real
knowledge about Evolution). You get the idea...
- Rick
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 18:37, you wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:21:26AM -0500, Douglas Green wrote:
> > I still use linux for my file server (and it's perfect for the job), but
> > I reverted to XP on my laptop. Why? It wasn't so much that linux was
> > hard to use, or difficult to learn- it's the simple fact that I got
> > really REALLY tired of file compatibility problems. In my work there are
> > (unfortunately) certain standards that are unavoidable. Often, these
> > include some form of Microsoft product. For example, Outlook's calendar
> > free/available service for scheduling appointments, or generating
> > posters for meetings with Powerpoint (John, I believe you asked about
> > posters recently).
>
> I remember when you installed Linux on your laptop :) I'm sorry that it
> hasn't worked out for you. I suppose that it is hard to get Linux to
> fit in to an win environment. I should say though, that a lot of
> compatibility problems just require a little work. I am now able to
> print to the windows computer downstairs with ease, as well as open Word
> and Excel documents. I believe that the KDE powerpoint equivalent can
> open powerpoint documents.
>
> > Personally, I do not
> > view my choice of OS as a time to make my stand against all-that-is-evil
> > in the world. After all, we're talking about my JOB and my PRODUCTIVITY
> > here. I'll use the tools are compatible and standard.
>
> I personally try to not to encourage the attitude of "I hate Microsoft..
> I know!! I'll teach them a lesson by using Linux!". I think it leads to
> users who just become frustrated. Microsoft products do frustrate me
> very much, and after using Linux I could never go back to a MS os simply
> because I see how troublesome it is. However, I mainly use Linux
> because it works the best for me. I am the most productive in it. I
> *prefer* blackbox or kde over the windows interface anyday. I much
> prefer using LyX for my chem labs over Word. I would rather check my
> mail in mutt or even kmail than in Outlook. I find xchat to work better
> for me than mIRC. Basically, for most every windows application, I have
> grown accustomed to and become much more productive in, the Linux
> alternative. Plus Linux is a much more fun toy than Windows :)
>
> > IMHO, save your CDs, mass distro burnings, evangelism, and avoid
> > linux-snobbishness like the plague (ie: "do we really want everyone?"-
> > of course we do!). Linux has a lot to offer, but also a long way to go
> > before it is acceptable for the average end user whose only computer
> > exposure has been through MS products. If people learn on linux first, I
> > think it will be more accepted.
>
> Well, I think that mass distro burnings and evangelism are good for
> instance when we have DemoDays or when we go to computer shows. As has
> been said, this .Net launch is a gathering of developers who already
> know about Linux. That being said, I still think it would be good to
> let those people know about Linux and wplug, but we have to approach it
> correctly. We do want to help everyone who is willing to embark on the
> Linux odyssey, but elitism is definitely to be avoided. I'm not sure if
> Linux will ever be acceptable for the average user, but I think it
> certainly could benefit a lot of people.
>
> Linux works well for me. I think it would work well for a whole lot of
> people out there who do not even know about it. I want to help those
> individuals discover Linux and become productive using it, whomever they
> may be.
>
> -Zach
> _______________________________________________
> wplug mailing list
> wplug at wplug.org
> http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug
More information about the wplug
mailing list