[wplug] Bylaws

Luquilla Hughes luquilla at hotmail.com
Tue Feb 13 17:56:57 EST 2001


I second that.


>From: David Tessitor <dttessitor at home.com>
>Reply-To: wplug at wplug.org
>To: wplug at wplug.org
>Subject: Re: [wplug] Bylaws
>Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 18:10:06 -0500
>
>The material listed on the website are not really the bylaws of WPLUG.
>Evidently, as could best be discerned during the second Member 
>Organizational
>Meeting which focused upon the structure and decision process of WPLUG, 
>they had
>been put there after someone mentioned it would be a good idea to have 
>bylaws.
>So a search was done on the Internet for some bylaws, the name was simply
>changed to WPLUG, and they were posted to the website.  They were never 
>adopted
>by the group, nobody ever referred to them, and they have never been 
>followed.
>
>It is really a bit deceptive to have them there, and I have suggested that 
>they
>should be removed from the site.  It wouldn't hurt anything to take them 
>down.
>The only thing they have done is confuse those of us who didn't know any 
>better
>and thought they were actually the group's bylaws.  This was the root of a 
>major
>misunderstanding last fall and it spawned a distrust that has carried over 
>to
>the present.
>
>Please, please, please.   Someone put them out of their misery and delete 
>them
>before they can confuse some other poor, trusting chaps.
>
>David Tessitor
>=================================
>
>Draco Aardvark wrote:
>
> > I don't mean to be rude, but in the bylaws section of wplug.org, the
> > sections go:
> > I. Name
> > II. Purpose
> > III. Membership
> > V. Oficers
> > VI. Meatings
> > etc.
> >
> > What happened to section 4? Was it omited, or was Oficers suposed to be
> > section 4?
> >
> > By the way, I'm studying the constitution in school, the bylaws remind 
>me of
> > it, very democratic. But unlike the constitution (like the Articals of
> > Confederation) there is no way to raise money (other than volentarry
> > donation) and no way to change the bylaws, does anybody else see this as
> > possably being a probem? (not to be judgemental, it was very nice of our
> > founding fauthers to not want to controle WPLUG, but make it 
>democratic).
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wplug mailing list
> > wplug at wplug.org
> > http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug
>
>_______________________________________________
>wplug mailing list
>wplug at wplug.org
>http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




More information about the wplug mailing list