<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: [wplug-plan] Re: [wplug] Bylaws</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Or we could amend the "by-laws" to reflect reality:</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>(1) wplug is for linux;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>(2) General User Meetings (GUM's) are for learning linux;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>(3) Install Fests are for linux, networking, pizza and DVD's;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>(4) wplug list-serve is for linux;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>(5) wplug-plan is for planning the previous four items.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Short and sweet? :)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>..Alex.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Zach Paine [<A HREF="mailto:zman@angstrom.net">mailto:zman@angstrom.net</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 4:19 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: wplug-plan@wplug.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: [wplug-plan] Re: [wplug] Bylaws</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Of the people that have spoken up, it seems that it's ok to remove the link</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>to the bylaws. I see no problem with removing the link myself. If anyone</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>disagrees, now is the time to speak up.</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>