[From nobody Tue Oct 16 22:49:37 2012 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:20:32 -0500 From: dan vogel <dmv@andrew.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: Is there a meeting anytime? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21L.0102121402280.11394-100000@unix12.andrew.cmu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii As a reminder, there is a movie this evening: 2001. This is definately worth the time and effort if you've never seen it (or not in a long time). With regards to the club being dead: "We're not dead yet". It just looks that way. As an insider to the organization, I think I can provide some of the why? - Size: The club was, effectively, dead when "we" took it over in Spring 1999. For whatever reason, the main participant in the "coup" had the impression that the death was mostly a function of the long standing control of the organization by folks who had ceased to be students (or care?). The real result was that the club became the size of the participants in the "coup". Over the past 2 years we've grown by approximately one. - Purpose: The standing historical theory on the death of the club is that it had lost its need or relevance. The heydays of the club were the 70s and 80s. By the mid-90s, "everyone" effectively had more than enough computer to play with in their room. The school of computer science was here. Any interest people had outside of academics in doing interesting things with computers could probably be accomplished on their personal computer. Social outlets could be found in the KGB or similar organizations, or in the free software world. The original purposes of the club have become obselete. No one has yet to come up with the purpose of the club in this decade. - Motivation: In line with the purpose, the motivations behind spending time working on the computer club organization leave much to be desired. The machine room as it is offers some great learning opportunities for system administration skills to be developed, resume-fodder et al: run live AFS, WWW, DNS, SMTP, NNTP services. Another victim of interest, free software, and the time sucking properties of SCS and CMU. - Limitations: As a result, the abilities of the club are limited by the time, motivations, and interests of the few folks involved in the club. We'd like to have other people express any interest -- but the notion that we can provide a constant, or any, stream of meetings and lectures is... well -- why? Therefore, the club exists as an outlet of the interest of the present members. There is not the density or motivation to put in the massive effort to completely overhaul the club into a modern organization and attract membership. The club presently does what we can. Ask not what the club can do for you -- ask what you can do for the club. At that same time, would you please also answer what you want the club to do that you'd be interested in expending any kind of effort on? Talk is cheap: organizing talks is time consuming. And we get such pathetic repeat participation -- populations, even -- that the motivation has to be personal. This is why the CLUG died: at the last talk, *NO ONE* showed up. Just the people who set it up. We postered, made prior announcements, etc. Clearly, there was little interest! And from that, it became apparent that if we were interested in learning about something, its easier to approach a professor or researcher for information and discussion rather than for the purpose of arranging a public talk. And while the CLUG was fine, there was too much passive interest. And so we are left with a neglected AFS cell, an overloaded, underappreciated NNTP server, and a movie series. Movies are relatively easy (though it must be subsidized by us, because the club is broke) and relatively entertaining. If someone would like to do something under the banner of the computer club, or discuss these issues -- come to the movie tonight and talk with us, or send us email. info@club.cc.cmu.edu. Thank you. dan ]