[wplug-plan] Making the big changes

[John Lewis]

Greg,

I don't see why it is necessary to wait to until January to have a 
constitutional convention. We could just utilize the medium we currently 
have (Email) to do it. There isn't anything to stop us except for 
ratification and that doesn't happen until everything else is worked out 
anyways.

Email isn't that bad. The kernel developers use to use emails, tar 
balls, Gnu c compiler, and file transfer protocol to develop the kernel. 
Sure they can do it a bit easier now with git, but we have git too if we 
need it.

On 12/05/2012 03:59 PM, simkins greg wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> The key word in your comments is "...because of our bylaws".  Yes, they should be changed.  I am not sure how to do that and I will likely be unavailable for your convention, unless it happens in late January/early February (I expect to be home for a few weeks).  I found out how WPLUG differs from every other organization to which I belonged when I was asked to stand for office.  Normally, this would be an honor and I was honored, until I found out that I was just an extra name on the list to make the election competitive.  I was hurt and insulted and stopped participating in any WPLUG politics. I see no reason for a competitive election.  If there is a controversial issue, then I guess that requires a competitive election, but normally professional groups operation by consensus.  Volunteer labor is hard enough to come by without such nonsense.
>
> If you don't want to throw out the bylaws and adopt model bylaws from a healthy organization, then perhaps you could benchmark off of any nationally successful organization.  I belonged to ASM and ASQ for most of my career.
>
> I mean these comments to be constructive.  I still enjoy WPLUG meetings when I can make it.  I just cannot abide WPLUG politics.
>
> Greg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wplug-plan mailing list
> wplug-plan at wplug.org
> http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug-plan