[wplug-plan] Making the big changes

[simkins greg]

On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Justin at js-wordsmith.com wrote:

> Greg, I'm not saying that our bylaws have to go, but I'm also not saying that they have to stay. I AM saying that we should decide which approach to take and act on it. The original purpose of the USCC was to amend the Articles of Confederation, but they ended up devising a completely new system of government. Maybe we would as well; maybe we wouldn't. I'm not committed one way or the other.
> 
> 
> Justin Smith
> Electronic Communication Specialist
> 724-612-2837
> http://www.js-wordsmith.com

Hi Justin, 

I am in complete agreement with your open minded approach.  You explained nothing badly.  I appreciate your initiative.  For my part, I still enjoy avoiding WPLUG politics.

I guess I look at walking into a WPLUG meeting similar to walking into a retail store.  I walk in because I like the service offered (including the camaraderie).  I am willing to chip in appropriate payment (including personal effort) for that service.  But I do not tell the retail store how to run their business and I have no interest in the administration of WPLUG. If the service deteriorates, I tend not to show up any more. So perhaps the bylaws are not so much in need of review as the programming.  Like the bylaws the program doesn't require major revision. I usually enjoy the program when I am able to attend.  I also enjoy the email group (virtual meeting?).  

Greg  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.wplug.org/pipermail/wplug-plan/attachments/20121206/57588ff1/attachment.html