[wplug-plan] Meetting idea a debate stemming from the debate on line from the subject "On the subject of wardriving..."

[Beth Lynn]

Hello,

In theory a debate could work but as of now there are several important 
pieces that are missing.

1. A formal question in which to debate.
2. A definition of wardriving.
3. Someone to take the Affirmative
4. Someone to take the Opposed
5. A more structured debate format with giving time to both sides to state
the positions and rebuttal
6. Someone to judge to we keep things on time and enforce who is allowed 
to speak when

Anyone want to volunteer?

Thanks,
Beth Lynn

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jonathan S Billings wrote:

> Michael P. O Connor wrote:
>> This has been a very intersting talk, on the wplug list.  And I have
>> gotten an idea, is it posable (with the blessings of the board) that
>> maybe we could scedual a Saterday for a full debate, we could get the
>> different people on this list that have already done some debate on it,
>> mail each other so they can prepear for it. here is a suggested sqedula
>>
>> 1) Each side will have 30 minutes to present their side of the argument
>> 2) 30 Miniute break to prepare a responce to the other sides points
>> 3) present their responces
>> 4) Questions from the audiance to the two sides (how ever much time is
>> needed to anser questiosn or till we have to leave)
>
> I think this is fairly well done on the mailing list.  It'd be nice if
> some people got together and did a joint presentation on what Wardriving
> is, but I don't think that a public debate would be very easy to run.
> People in WPLUG are too argumentative.
>
> -- 
> Jonathan S. Billings <billings at negate.org>
> _______________________________________________
> wplug-plan mailing list
> wplug-plan at wplug.org
> http://www.wplug.org/mailman/listinfo/wplug-plan
>