[wplug-plan] SSL Certificates

Evan DiBiase esd at cmu.edu
Tue Mar 16 19:27:58 EST 2004


On Mar 16, 2004, at 7:21 PM, James O'Kane wrote:

> Either way, the end-user will see a message that says they are viewing 
> an
> encrypted page, but the CA is not a known trusted authority. The 
> question
> is in essense, who that unknown third party is. wplug itself, or
> midnightlinux.com. (I'm going to create a midnightlinux.com CA anyway.)
>
> Does anyone have any strong opinions on this? Speak now.

I'd say that we should go with WPLUG. Nothing against midnightlinux, of 
course, but dragging in another entity that the typical user isn't 
likely to know well (for right now) just invites confusion.

Evan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.wplug.org/pipermail/wplug-plan/attachments/20040316/bf254fc4/attachment.bin 


More information about the wplug-plan mailing list