CORRECTION: Re: [wplug-plan] board nominee results

[Evan DiBiase]

On Wednesday, November 21, 2001, at 04:18 PM, Zach Paine wrote:

> Well, from my interpretation of the bylaws, it's a bit iffy.  While it
> does say that the board *may* establish two seperate lists, it then goes
> on to say:
>
> 	All discussion among the Directors concerning Board matters and
> 	proposals before the Board shall be held on such list(s), which
> 	shall be exclusively for the use of the Board, with an exception
> 	being that read access shall be provided to WPLUG participants.
> 	The list(s) archive shall constitute the minutes and record of
> 	decision.

I interpret this to mean that whatever lists are created for use of the 
board shall be exclusively for the use of the board, and shall have read 
access provided. The "list(s)" indicates that there could be one or more 
lists.

> Note the *shall* be held on such lists.  What would you prefer to do
> Evan?

I'd prefer to have one list until there is a practical reason to have 
more; I haven't seen such a reason yet.

-Evan