[wplug-internet] [wplug] Check out my photos on Facebook

[Pat Barron]

On 6/29/2012 12:07 AM, Vance Kochenderfer wrote:
> After thinking it over, I can't come up with any use case where the 
> Reply-To: header would be a legitimate indicator of the sender's identity.
>
> [...]
>
> Please speak up if there's a downside to this I'm not seeing!

I can't think of one.  The default behavior took me by surprise - I 
would not at all have expected "Reply-To:" to be used as an indication 
of who the sender is...

--Pat.