[wplug-board] One other agenda item for the next board meeting
joe.prostko at gmail.com
Sat Apr 28 16:01:48 EDT 2012
Again, I'll add this to the agenda as well. I admit I'm fairly
indifferent at the moment, but will have a solid stance after I hear
the arguments for and against keeping the Revival Committee.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Terence J. Golightly
<terencejgolightly at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/28/2012 12:32 PM, Pat Barron wrote:
>> I'm going to introduce a proposal to dissolve the ErieLUG Revival
>> Committee, and rescind the existing Special Rule of Order related to it.
>> This committee hasn't really functioned, or even existed for all
>> practical purposes (not even listed on the Committees page right now),
>> so this is just a quick cleanup to make WPLUG's governance on paper
>> match with reality...
>> wplug-board mailing list
>> wplug-board at wplug.org
> I think that your idea has merit. WPLUG needs to focus on its core.
> Erie is part of that core. However, since we have no members or afaik
> mailing list lurkers from that area we should give your proposal serious
> consideration. On the other hand, is it causing WPLUG any harm in
> keeping ErieLUG as an inactive entity? I'd be interested in hearing
> your arguments as to why it needs to go.
> Chairman The Western Pennsylvania Linux User's Group
> chair at wplug.org
> wplug-board mailing list
> wplug-board at wplug.org
More information about the wplug-board